The same discipline, different pressure points.
The method doesn't change by industry. What changes is where the exposure concentrates and which findings an auditor reaches for first.
Sectors we work in
The method does not change. Where the exposure sits does.
Financial services
SoD and evidence under regulator scrutiny
Mining
Contractors, remote sites, high turnover
Manufacturing
Plant-level org design at scale
Retail
Store access and seasonal staff
Public sector
Procurement and delegated authority
Where the difference actually shows
Financial services
Regulatory scrutiny is constant and the SoD conversation is never theoretical. The work concentrates on defensible residual risk, evidence quality and recertification that stands up to a regulator rather than just an internal auditor.
Mining
Remote sites, contractor-heavy workforces and high turnover make provisioning and leaver processes the weak point. Plant and org-level design carries more weight here than in most sectors.
Manufacturing
Plant-level org design and a large shop-floor user base mean role count grows fast. Getting derived role structure right early is the difference between a maintainable catalogue and thousands of near-identical roles.
Retail
Store-level access, seasonal staff and high-volume provisioning. Fiori adoption tends to be broad and shallow, which makes launchpad design and space assignment unusually important.
Public sector
Procurement and payment controls attract the most audit attention, alongside long-lived accounts and delegated authority. Documentation and approval trails matter as much as the technical design.
Bring us in at the gate that suits you.
Phase 01 stands alone as a fixed-price baseline assessment if you want to understand your exposure before committing a workstream.